System
The assessment system provides an overview of the achieved learning outcomes, student learning progress, and evaluation of teaching and learning. The types and organization of the assessment are described in the module description of each course. The assessment system also includes an explanation of learning outcome calculation based on PLO and CLO arrangements. The assessment evaluates the student learning process and learning outcomes.
Based on the Rector’s Decree number 1189.a/UN39/PK.00/2020 Regarding Academic Guidelines, course examinations are conducted at least twice in a semester, which is the Midterm examination and Final Examinations. Meanwhile, the assignment assessment includes several types, such as quizzes, paper writing, and project report writing, conducted at every meeting or at the end of the semester. The scoring system is presented in the table below.
|
Comprehension |
Letter Grade |
Numerical Grade |
|
86—100 % |
A |
4 |
|
81—85 % |
A- |
3.7 |
|
76—80 % |
B+ |
3.3 |
|
71—75 % |
B |
3 |
|
66—70 % |
B- |
2.7 |
|
61—65 % |
C+ |
2.3 |
|
56—60 % |
C |
2 |
|
51—55 % |
C- |
1.7 |
|
46—50 % |
D |
1 |
|
< 46 % |
E |
0 |
The Scoring System is provided in table above, where the minimum score to pass each course is C for undergraduate programs and B for master’s programs. Students who do not pass a course must re-enroll the next semester and re-register in the SIAKAD academic system through the link (http://siakad.unj.ac.id). The academic regulations also stipulate examination requirements and deadlines for entering grades in the academic system (http://siakad.unj.ac.id/). The assessment results of face-to-face courses must be uploaded within two weeks.Students can take make-up exams under the following conditions: a) Sick and must be hospitalized by showing a letter from the hospital; b) Have a mandatory assignment from the university or state; c) Experience a disaster by showing a letter from the person in charge). Make-up exams for midterm and final exams are completed separately after the main exam schedule has been completed. Assessment for the final project is accomplished by assessing the research proposal through a proposal seminar by a panel of examiners. For the undergraduate level, the panel consists of 3 examiners. As for the master’s level, the panel consists of 5 examiners. The assessment of the final research report is accomplished through the final project trial defense by a panel of five examiners. The assessment is based on educational, authentic, objective, transparent, and accountable values. The proposal seminar and final defense assessment instruments follow the university assessment instruments. The assessment instruments for proposals and final thesis for undergraduate and master’s level.
Method
Assessment are conducted through direct and indirect assessment. Direct assessment measures Cognitive (knowledge and understanding), such as Exams, Essay Writing, Work Reports, Laboratory Reports, Oral Exams, Presentations, Projects, and Seminars. While indirect assessment measures Affective and Psychomotor (attitude and ability), such as Focus Groups, Practicum, Case Studies, and Interviews. Based on the latest academic rules, the weight of project-based learning (PjBL) and case-based learning (CBL) assessment is at least half of the passing grade of a course. The assessed aspects also include student activities such as attendance and active participation of students when performing learning discussions, practices, cooperation, and execution and collection of assignments.